Final answer:
Rulers considered legitimate by their population often derive their authority from accepted societal sources such as hereditary succession or divine right. Monarchies have varied in the scope of power over time, transitioning in some regions to ceremonial roles within constitutional monarchies.
Step-by-step explanation:
Rulers who are seen as right and proper by key segments of their nation's population often have a source of legitimacy that is acknowledged within society, such as hereditary succession or the notion of divine right. Thus, the statement can be considered True.
Throughout history, monarchies have been common forms of government. In a monarchy, a single person, the monarch, rules in a system that is often justified by hereditary succession or divine right. These rulers were not only seen as political figures but also as holders of sacred authority. The concept of divine right was particularly significant in justifying a monarch's rule, suggesting that a ruler's authority came directly from a divine source and was therefore unquestionable.
In modern times, many constitutional monarchies such as Great Britain and Canada have evolved from absolute monarchies. In these forms of government, the monarchy serves more as a ceremonial figurehead, with actual governmental power being held by elected officials like prime ministers. Nonetheless, monarchs maintain their positions, often because of the public's appreciation of tradition and ceremonial rites.