Final answer:
The statement that people read more perceptively from a printed page than from a computer screen is generally true, but research offers mixed evidence. Studies show that paper might be better for comprehension, although evolving technologies and individual preferences continue to influence reading habits.
Step-by-step explanation:
Research indicates that people read more perceptively and with less fatigue from a printed page than a computer screen, which may lead to the conclusion that this statement is generally true. However, the evidence on this topic is mixed. A study by Mangen, Walgermo, and Bronnick (2013) found that students who read text on paper performed slightly better than their counterparts using e-books in a reading comprehension exam. In contrast, research by Noyes and Garland (2008) shows no definitive conclusion regarding the efficacy of screen versus paper reading. Earlier, Andrews (1992) reported that people tend to read more slowly and with less comprehension when reading from screens. But this topic may be affected by evolving screen technologies and individual reader preferences.
Reading methods can significantly affect how we comprehend and retain information. Printed materials have been the traditional medium, and some readers continue to find this format allows for better concentration and less distraction. As technology evolves and reading habits change, the debate between digital and print reading continues, but for some, the preference for printed text remains because of its perceived advantages in comprehension and comfort.