228k views
3 votes
Even with all of the advances in recent years, forecasting is typically considered more of an art than a science and it is of little use in generating accurate predictions?

a)True
b)False

User SimonRH
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The statement 'Even with all of the advances in recent years, forecasting is typically considered more of an art than a science and it is of little use in generating accurate predictions' is False. Forecasting has become more accurate with the use of mathematical models, data analysis, and advanced technology in various fields, including political science.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement 'Even with all of the advances in recent years, forecasting is typically considered more of an art than a science and it is of little use in generating accurate predictions' is False. While forecasting may involve some subjective elements and uncertainties, it is not accurate to say that it is of little use in generating accurate predictions. The use of mathematical models, data analysis, and advanced technology has greatly improved the accuracy of forecasting in various fields, including political science, weather forecasting, and economics.

For example, in political science, researchers can make better predictions by having access to more data and using advanced technology for data analysis. The use of longitudinal studies, surveys, and statistical models can help political scientists analyze past trends, identify patterns, and make accurate predictions about political behavior and election outcomes.

Furthermore, the development and refinement of precise models have allowed scientists to accurately describe population changes and make predictions about future changes. While some older models may have been modified or abandoned due to their lack of predictive ability, scholars are constantly striving to create effective new models.

User Dgruending
by
7.7k points