Final answer:
Nature is to nurture as nativism is to behaviorism, illustrating the comparison between genetic predispositions and inherited traits versus learned behaviors and environmental influences.
Step-by-step explanation:
The debate of nature versus nurture is an ongoing conversation in psychology, presenting the argument about the extent to which particular aspects of behavior are a product of either inherited (nature), or acquired (nurture) influences. Nature refers to the influence of genetic inheritance and other biological factors, while nurture refers to all environmental influences after conception, such as culture, experience, and learning.
Nativism is a view that certain skills or abilities are 'native' or hard wired into the brain at birth. This is in line with the 'nature' aspect of the debate. In contrast, the corresponding concept to nativism in the opposite pole of this debate would be behaviorism, which asserts that all behaviors are acquired through conditioning and environmental influences.
In this analogy, nature is to nurture as nativism is to behaviorism: where nature highlights the role of innate behaviors and genetic predispositions, and nurture emphasizes the importance of learning and experiences throughout life.