Final answer:
The statement about strict adherence to an established formula for time allocation in word work is false because educational practices require flexibility to meet individual student needs and circumstances. Understanding concepts is more important than memorization of formulas, and educational patterns vary widely.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that "teachers should never deviate from the established formula for the grade they teach" regarding how much time to allocate to word work is false. In educational practice, flexibility is essential since each student's needs may differ. Teachers should adjust their strategies based on various factors, such as individual student needs, subject complexity, and learning objectives. This approach aligns with the belief that understanding concepts is more important than relying solely on formulas, as expressed in A.8 Equation Hunting.
Moreover, studies on study habits, like Example 2.22, show that there is no one-size-fits-all answer when it comes to the number of hours students should study. The interpretation of results, such as the time students do homework (11.2 Teachers), should consider broader contexts rather than rigid adherence to formulas. Additionally, percentages like the 30th percentile of studying hours are descriptive and not prescriptive, meaning they describe trends rather than prescribe actions.
Lastly, even in statistical exercises like calculating the probability of students doing their homework, as in the case of the 70 percent of statistics students, the real scenarios require a more nuanced understanding beyond strict adherence to established formulas.