Final answer:
Goldhill expects her readers to critically engage with her essay, connect emotionally and intellectually, and be inspired to potentially change their viewpoints or behavior.
Step-by-step explanation:
In her essay, Goldhill likely expects her reader to react by engaging critically with the text, reflecting on their own experiences, and considering their personal responses to her arguments. This critical engagement can manifest as emotional reactions, intellectual contemplation, or even motivation to change one's viewpoint or actions. Through strategic use of rhetorical devices such as pathos and by providing either statistical validation or anecdotal examples, Goldhill aims to resonate with her audience and inspire deeper thought or real-world action.
For instance, when an author like Trumbore uses pathos, it's a deliberate attempt to tug at the reader's emotions in order to effectively convey her standpoint and facilitate empathy from the audience. Similarly, ending an essay by encouraging reflection or a call to action, as shown in Speculation, prompts the readers not only to think but potentially to alter their behavior or perspectives moving forward.
Stepping back for a broader view, the strategy of revisiting or evolving a thesis, as demonstrated by Lily Tran, works to either grasp the reader's attention at the start or leave a lasting impression at the end. These methods are crafted to elicit a thoughtful and engaged response, which is ultimately what Goldhill expects from her readers.