58.0k views
2 votes
The costs described in situations iii and v are a. Relevant costs. b. Discretionary costs. c. Sunk costs. d. Prime costs.

a) a. Relevant costs
b) b. Discretionary costs
c) c. Sunk costs
d) d. Prime costs

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The text discusses the concept of sunk costs, which are past incurred costs that cannot be recovered and therefore should not influence future business decisions. Sunk costs are typically associated with fixed costs, while variable costs are relevant to decisions about present and future cost management within the budget constraint framework. Thus, the correct option is C.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question appears to ask about the classification of costs based on different scenarios labeled as 'situations iii and v'. When considering any firm's operations, costs can be classified in a variety of ways depending on their relevance to decision-making, whether they are controllable, directly tied to production, or have already been incurred without the possibility of recovery.

The provided text refers to sunk costs, which are costs that have already been spent and cannot be recovered, and therefore should be ignored when making future economic decisions.

In a short-run perspective of cost analysis, fixed costs are often considered sunk costs because a firm has already incurred these costs, and they cannot be altered by any future decisions.

Decisions about future actions, such as production levels or pricing, should not take these past costs into account. On the other hand, variable costs are important for decision-making as they provide information about a firm's current ability to cut costs or how costs will change with varying production levels.

The budget constraint framework also suggests that sunk costs should not affect current decisions since they pertain to past choices that cannot be modified. Therefore, understanding the nature of different costs is crucial to proper business decision-making.

User FateNuller
by
7.6k points