Final answer:
Kristen Monroe's assertion about the core of political science being the study of power and the authoritative allocation of values is true. It aligns with sociological and political science frameworks such as functionalism, conflict theory, and the work of Max Weber on power and authority.
Step-by-step explanation:
Kristen Monroe's argument that the core of political science involves the study of power, the authoritative allocation of values, and the relationship between the individual and society is indeed true. This is corroborated by numerous frameworks used by sociologists and political scientists to analyze politics. Functionalism, for example, looks at how societal power is based upon cooperation and shared values. Conflict theory, originating from Marxism, interprets societal structures as emerging from the competition for resources and influence. Symbolic interactionism focuses on the individual level, analyzing how people perceive and react to symbols of power in political realms.
Max Weber, a significant figure in sociology, distinguished between power and authority, noting that authority is based on the perceived legitimacy of the person wielding power. This aligns with Monroe's perspective on the authoritative allocation of values. Additionally, political science not only examines this distribution of power but also how it impacts individuals, social norms, and the government's political process. Therefore, Monroe's assertion encapsulates important dimensions of political science.