Question

This case held that people, not places, are protected from government intrusion whenever they have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

a) Miranda v. Arizona
b) Roe v. Wade
c) Mapp v. Ohio
d) Katz v. United States

Answer 1

Katz v. United States is the case that established that individuals are protected from government intrusion when they have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Step-by-step explanation:

The case that held that people, not places, are protected from government intrusion whenever they have a reasonable expectation of privacy is Katz v. United States. The landmark decision in Katz v. United States established that the Fourth Amendment's ban on unreasonable searches and seizures applies wherever an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy, extending the protection beyond physical spaces to the privacy of individuals.

This principle has been foundational in understanding privacy rights in the United States. On the other hand, cases like Miranda v. Arizona established the requirement for suspects to be informed of their rights upon arrest, while Mapp v. Ohio prohibited the use of illegally obtained evidence in court.