Final answer:
NGOs are most active and influential in democratic states, where freedom of expression and assembly are protected, allowing these organizations to operate effectively and contribute to society. Totalitarian and autocratic states often impose restrictions that limit NGO activity, while anarchic states lack the security and systems for NGOs to work effectively.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering which states non-governmental organizations (NGOs) should be most active and influential in, it is important to assess the type of government and level of freedoms allowed. NGOs often flourish in democratic states where there is a free press and a higher tolerance for a diversity of views and organizations. These organizations can play a crucial role in advocacy, development, and providing checks and balances on government action.
In contrast, totalitarian states and autocratic states usually suppress the activities of NGOs, as these governments exercise complete control and often view such organizations as a threat to their power. In anarchic states, where there is no overriding authority, NGOs may face challenges in operations due to a lack of security and established systems to work within. Therefore, while NGOs might strive to operate within these environments to address humanitarian concerns, their influence and ability to operate effectively are often severely limited compared to democratic states.
Democratic states are the most conducive environments for NGOs to be active and influential, as evidenced by the coexistence of multiple religious communities in democratic countries like India and the historical lack of substantial famine in democracies with a free press.