186k views
0 votes
Instead of using height to predict sex, use the type variable. True or False?

a) True
b) False

User Safran Ali
by
6.9k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

The question asks if using the 'type' variable is a better predictor of sex than height. Without more information, a definitive answer cannot be determined.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question asks whether using the 'type' variable is a better predictor of sex than using height. The 'type' variable refers to a different characteristic or feature that might be used to predict sex. This could be the type of hormones present, the presence of certain anatomical features, or any other relevant factor.

To determine whether this is true or false, we would need to compare the predictive accuracy of height and the 'type' variable. This could be done through statistical analysis, such as calculating the correlation coefficient or conducting a chi-square test.

Without further information about the specific type variable and its relationship to sex, it is difficult to definitively say if using the type variable is a better predictor of sex than height. Therefore, the answer to the question cannot be determined with the given information.

User AndyMoore
by
7.3k points