Final answer:
The final decision in the case of Konic International Corporation v. Spokane Computer Services, Inc. is not provided in the question, but the information given regarding Microsoft's case involves unfair competition and restrictive practices that may be related to intellectual property issues. The correct option is a) Breach of contract by Konic International Corporation
Step-by-step explanation:
In the case of Konic International Corporation v. Spokane Computer Services, Inc., the final decision by the court has not been provided in the question. However, based on the information provided regarding Microsoft's litigation in 2000, we can infer that the case in question might deal with similar issues such as unfair competition, restrictive practices, or intellectual property regulations.
The Microsoft case involved unfair competition, where the company's practices were deemed restrictive and they later reached a settlement to end these practices. This might suggest that answers b) Violation of trade secret laws by Spokane Computer Services, Inc. c) Unlawful use of proprietary information d) Non-compliance with intellectual property regulations could potentially be related to the outcome of the Konic v. Spokane case.
We would need additional information to determine if one of these options was indeed the basis for the court's decision in that specific case. The correct option is a) Breach of contract by Konic International Corporation