Final answer:
Directives within the zone of indifference are typically obeyed by employees as they are seen as reasonable, making the statement true.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that directives falling within the zone of indifference are obeyed, whereas those falling outside of it are not, is largely true. The concept of the zone of indifference was introduced by Chester Barnard in his theory of organizations. In this context, the zone of indifference refers to the range of directives or orders that an employee is willing to accept without reservation. If a directive falls within an employee's zone of indifference, it is likely to be followed because it is deemed acceptable or reasonable. Conversely, if a directive falls outside of this zone, the employee may resist or disregard it because it is viewed as unreasonable or beyond their professional capacity or moral judgment.