Final answer:
The conclusion N is derived from the premises S ⊃ W, ∼S, and S ∨ N using the logical principle of disjunctive syllogism.
Step-by-step explanation:
The student's question involves validating a logical argument with a series of premises and a conclusion. Given the premises S ⊃ W, ∼S, and S ∨ N, the conclusion derived can be N.
The justification for deriving this conclusion from the premises is the application of a disjunctive syllogism which is a form of valid deductive inferences.
In this case, according to disjunctive syllogism, if one has a disjunction (S ∨ N) and one of the disjuncts is negated (∼S), then the other disjunct (N) must be true.
Therefore, from the given premises, since we have ∼S (the negation of S), it leads us to conclude that N must be true, which becomes the conclusion of the argument.