209k views
4 votes
Read the passage. Then answer the question. " Face-to-Face vs. Virtual Friends" What is the main argument of the passage? What claims dies the author make to support the argument? How valid, relevant, and sufficient is the reasoning and evidence used to support the argument and claims? Does the author use false statements or fallacious reasoning to support the argument and claims? Use evidence from the text to support your response. Your evaluation of the argument should be two or three complete paragraphs. ( You Will Have To Expand The Picture To Read The Passage).

User Joelm
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The passage in question discusses the differences and similarities between virtual and face-to-face learning, focusing on student responsibility and attentiveness. It appears to present a valid and well-supported argument without reliance on false statements or fallacious reasoning.

Step-by-step explanation:

The main argument of the passage titled "Face-to-Face vs. Virtual Friends" centers on the differences and similarities between virtual learning and face-to-face learning, specifically focusing on the themes of student responsibility, attentiveness, and the environment. The author supports this argument by claiming that regardless of the learning mode, student responsibility is paramount. In virtual learning, students need to self-moderate distractions and ensure reliable internet connectivity, while face-to-face learning provides these elements inherently. However, in both modes, students must remain conscious of their responsibilities to succeed academically.

While evaluating the argument, the reasoning appears to be valid, relevant, and sufficiently supported by evidence, based on the claims made. The author does not seem to employ any false statements or fallacious reasoning. The arguments are presented factually and are supported by reasonable inferences, as indicated by the structure and examples given in the paragraphs. The author has also maintained an objective tone, which adds to the argument's credibility.

User Matias Diez
by
7.7k points