Final answer:
Evaluating the success of a movement includes assessing congruence with organizational goals and actual outcomes, systemic impact, and advocacy efforts.
Step-by-step explanation:
When evaluating the success of a movement, particularly one that has adopted the Grassridge approach, analysts often consider whether the program implemented at the local level is in alignment with the larger organizational goals and whether it has achieved the desired outcomes. In the given context, success is not just measured by the expansion of relationships among participants, but also by the systematic impact on local communities and national levels. The relational-based changes narrative shows participants forming lasting connections through regular meetings and collaborative projects, transcending socio-economic barriers, and engaging in social justice causes. However, the lack of systemic changes, advocacy, and policy approaches indicates limited long-term impact on broader society despite personal growth and network expansion among participants.
Similarly, without a focus on larger systemic reforms or advocacy efforts, grassroots movements can struggle to create substantive changes locally or nationally. While local programs may align with a national organization's goals, as described in Mini-Case Study Twelve, they may still not translate to greater success without strategic adjustments. Additionally, strategies such as the amplification model aim to gain a wider appeal by expanding core ideas, mobilizing more supporters, and influencing public opinion, yet may still fall short of producing desired systemic changes if not coupled with effective policy and advocacy efforts.