Final answer:
Throughout history, kings gave their sons wealth in the form of land, labor, and prestige objects. This was a measure to secure their sons’ status and loyalty, and it also played a role in succession practices, such as the division of Chinggis Khan's estate among his heirs.
Step-by-step explanation:
The historical texts reflect that kings often provided their sons with various forms of wealth, which typically included land, labor, and prestige objects. These tangible assets were meant to establish and secure their progeny’s status and ensure their loyalty. For instance, Yu was rewarded by the king for his service with prosperity that he could pass on to his descendants. Similarly, according to the Mongol tradition, Chinggis Khan's estate was to be divided among his four sons, allocating a portion of the empire along with the responsibilities to rule and manage it.
In other cases, the distribution of riches by a monarch could lead to conflicts within the royal domain, as when a king would reduce his own holdings to reward his loyal servants or resolve disputes by reallocating fiefdoms. Furthermore, there were also intricate laws governing the bequeathing of property, as seen in the legal code which allowed a mother to leave all her holdings to the son of her choice after her husband's death, providing the sons raised no objections.