Final answer:
The change in the 2081 short film to include a bomb plot rather than a peaceful declaration of emperorship by Harrison fundamentally alters the story's approach to human nature and rebellion. It suggests a more desperate and potentially violent response to oppression and reflects modern societal concerns.
Step-by-step explanation:
The alteration in the 2081 short film where Harrison plants a bomb rather than declaring himself as emperor represents a stark shift in the narrative from the original 'Harrison Bergeron' short story. This change might reflect modern concerns about terrorism and the extent individuals might go to when battling oppressive regimes. This act of planting a bomb in the film adaptation also sheds light on our understanding of human nature, suggesting a potential for violence and desperation in the pursuit of freedom, which contrasts with the more individualistic and nonviolent approach Harrison takes in the story by Kurt Vonnegut.
One might speculate that the filmmaker adapted the story in this manner to create a more dramatic climax or to comment on the ways in which media can be manipulated to create fear—a reflection of our post-9/11 world. Additionally, altering Harrison's method of rebellion to a potentially violent act could be a commentary on how today's society handles oppression and the lengths people are willing to go for liberation within a heavily surveilled state.