Final answer:
The true/false statement provided is incomplete and unclear, but it suggests that non-professionals should not attempt to interview suspects when Special Investigations (SI) is handling a case. It is generally true that law enforcement professionals should handle suspect interviews, especially in serious matters like armed robbery, to avoid compromising the investigation and to protect suspects' rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'If SI is responding, please do not attempt to interview suspects?' is not complete or clear in its current form, but it seems to be asking whether individuals should refrain from interviewing suspects if a Special Investigations (SI) unit is involved. In law enforcement, SI units typically handle specialized or complex investigations. Considering the information provided, which states that both suspects would be better off remaining silent, it appears that the question addresses the right to silence or the strategy behind questioning by law enforcement. Without more context, the statement's truth cannot be definitively judged. However, in many jurisdictions, it is true that suspects have the right to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination, particularly when Special Investigations or experienced detectives are conducting interviews.
Furthermore, when law enforcement agents are investigating, particularly during serious incidents like armed robbery, it is standard procedure for unqualified individuals to avoid interviewing suspects to prevent jeopardizing the investigation or contaminating witness statements due to suggestibility, as seen during the sniper attacks in the DC area in 2002, where false memories and tips could mislead the investigation.