Final answer:
The findings or penalties of the Administrative Law Hearings Examiners are reported to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), who presides over government hearings and has the authority to issue decisions on regulatory issues within an agency.
Step-by-step explanation:
To Whom Are the Findings of the Administrative Law Hearings Examiners Reported?
The findings or penalties of the Administrative Law Hearings Examiners are typically reported to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The ALJ is the official who presides over government hearings and possesses the authority to make legal decisions on regulatory or disciplinary issues within an agency. Administrative law hearings are not criminal trials, but rather are a process used to enforce and apply regulations within various government agencies.
After the hearing examiner, also known as an ALJ, reviews the evidence and the testimonies presented during the administrative hearing, he or she will issue a decision. This decision can include fines, actions, or other penalties related to the regulatory issue at hand. The role of the ALJ is within the judicial branch of government, as they enforce and interpret the law similarly to how judges operate in traditional courts.
However, the ALJ's decision is not the final step; it can often be appealed to a higher authority within the agency or eventually to a federal court. This process ensures fairness and legal adherence within the federal regulatory system. It's important to note that the other options given in the question—such as the General Attorney, the President, and the Department of Justice—are not typically the recipients of the ALJ's findings in an administrative hearing.