Final answer:
The dark side of the internet presents challenges that require careful consideration and collaboration to address. Regulating illegal activities, hate speech, and disinformation without stifling the internet's positive aspects is crucial. Achieving a balance between protection and freedom of expression is complex but essential.
Step-by-step explanation:
In response to Jaron's claim that our society cannot survive until we fix the dark side of the internet, it is important to consider the various perspectives and challenges associated with regulating online activities. The internet has become a multifaceted tool that allows for both positive and negative uses. While it is essential to address concerns such as illegal activities, hate speech, and disinformation, completely fixing the dark side of the internet may be a complex task requiring collaboration across governments, technological advancements, and user education.
First, it is crucial to acknowledge that the internet provides numerous benefits, including access to information, communication, and opportunities for individuals and businesses. However, there are legitimate concerns regarding illegal activities, hate speech, and disinformation that can harm individuals and society. Consequently, efforts to regulate the dark side of the internet should focus on addressing these issues without stifling its positive aspects.
Second, the challenge lies in determining what should be restricted and who decides this. In democratic countries like the United States, the court system plays a role in settling disputes and determining the legality of certain online activities. However, on a global scale, governments have different approaches and responses to internet regulation. Achieving a balance between protecting against malicious activities and preserving freedom of expression is a complex task.