319,363 views
11 votes
11 votes
"We the people of the states of New-Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New-York, New-Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North-Carolina, South-Carolina, and Georgia, do ordain, declare and establish the following constitution for the government of ourselves and our posterity.

Report of the Committee of Detail in the Federal Convention, August 1787, page one
"WE the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Report of the Committee of Style in the Federal Convention, September 1787, page one.


1)What arguments would the framers offer for keeping the list of individual states? For replacing the list of states with "the United States"? I NEED HELPPPPPO

User OKonyk
by
2.6k points

1 Answer

6 votes
6 votes

Answer:

The framers might offer several arguments for keeping the list of individual states. First, it would serve as a reminder of the federal nature of the government and the rights of the states. Second, it would emphasize the importance of the states in ratifying and adopting the Constitution. Third, it would show that the Constitution was not intended to create a central government, but rather a federal system in which the states would play a key role.

On the other hand, the framers might argue that replacing the list of states with "the United States" would be more accurate, since the Constitution was created by "the people of the United States" and not just the people of the individual states. It would also emphasize the national character of the government and the fact that it was created to serve the people of the entire country, not just the people of the individual states.

User Seburdis
by
2.8k points