Final answer:
The question reflects upon the historical context of military strategy leadership , focusing on the balance between personal advancement, political motive, and the welfare of the state and army.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question touches on various historical figures and events that speak to the theme of leadership and military strategy. It discusses the relationship between emperors, their military decisions, and the implications of those decisions on the well-being of both the state and the army.
From the passages provided, we see examples of emperors and military leaders such as Taizong and Caligula, who are reminded of their responsibilities towards their subjects and troops. The balance between personal gain, political stability, and the welfare of the people is emphasized.
Phrases like "military offensives should be balanced with the good of the people" and "enlightened ruler is heedful, and the good general full of caution" are fundamental to understanding the ethic and strategy involved in historical military leadership.
The discussions cover the consequences of military actions which are taken due to personal motives rather than for the state's advantage, and the importance of caution and strategy ("attacking by stratagem") in maintaining a stable and peaceful state.
The complete question: Kailyn: The Emperor will hear about this! Note To self: Sell out troops for personal political gain...