the correct quotient of
is
, and not
as Diya concluded.
Let's analyze Diya's approach to dividing 2.82 by 3 and see if her conclusion that the quotient is 0.94 is correct.
Diya's method:
1. She regrouped 2 as 20 tenths.
2. She regrouped 0.82 as 7 tenths and 10 hundredths.
3. She then divided the tenths and hundredths by 3.
Now, let's follow her method:
-
tenths divided by 3 is
tenths, which equals to
tenths with
tenths remaining.
-
remaining tenths is
hundredths, added to the
tenths previously regrouped from 0.82 and the
hundredths gives us
hundredths in total.
-
hundredths divided by 3 is
hundredths, which equals to
hundredths.
Adding these together:
-
.
-
.
So,
.
Therefore, the correct quotient of
is
, and not
as Diya concluded.
Looking at the given options, none of them correctly states that the quotient is
. There may be an error in the options provided, as none of them match the correct calculation. However, the correct conclusion is closest to options 3 and 4, except for the quotient value which should be 0.69 instead of 0.76. Diya's quotient of 0.94 is incorrect because the division of tenths and hundredths she performed does not give 9 tenths and 4 hundredths per group.