Final answer:
The use of news aggregators does not necessarily help people avoid partisan slant, as individuals often select sources that reinforce their existing beliefs, leading to echo chambers and bias by selection of sources.
Step-by-step explanation:
The use of news aggregators is often thought to help people avoid partisan slant and bias when selecting news. However, this may not always be the case. With the advent of new media platforms, individuals have the ability to customize their news experience, often leading to a phenomenon known as echo chambers, where people primarily access information that aligns with their existing beliefs. For example, Republicans may gravitate towards Fox News, while Democrats may prefer MSNBC. This self-selection can result in a bias by selection of sources, which means they may only be exposed to viewpoints that reaffirm their pre-existing opinions, rather than a balanced perspective.
Bias can also occur through bias by story selection, where media outlets may choose to report on stories that align with their perceived agenda while ignoring opposing views. This creates a filtered news experience rather than providing a comprehensive view of all sides of an issue. Therefore, while news aggregators can provide a diverse range of news sources, they do not automatically prevent biased selection or consumption of news.