Final answer:
Harry's views on immigration and job scarcity reflect historical prejudices and economic tensions related to labor supply and wages. These views have historically led to restrictive immigration legislation and continue to contribute to employment discrimination in the labor market.
Step-by-step explanation:
Harry's prejudice towards immigrants in the context of his difficulty finding employment is part of a broader historical and socio-economic discussion. This sentiment echoes past sentiments where immigration has been scapegoated for various economic issues, such as job scarcity and wage suppression for native workers. In the past, such views have led to significant legislation aimed at curbing immigration, like the Chinese Exclusion Act and the Immigration Act of 1924, based on fears that immigrants would disrupt the job market and social order.
Meanwhile, economically, the influx of immigrants often results in a shift in the supply of unskilled labor, which can lead to lower wages for those specific jobs. This situation can benefit consumers and certain households, but it places domestic low-skilled workers in a position where they must compete with immigrants, potentially resulting in negative impacts on their employment and wages.
Economist William A. Darity Jr. highlights that competitive market forces alone have not been sufficient to address employment discrimination, suggesting that historically-rooted prejudices and economic theories fail to account for discrimination in sectors with no customer contact, thereby contributing to ongoing disparities in the workforce.