Question

... In the legislature, promptitude of decision is oftener an evil than a benefit. The differences of opinion, and the jarrings of

parties in that department of the government, though they may sometimes obstruct salutary plans, yet often promote
deliberation and circumspection, and serve to check excesses in the majority. When a resolution too is once taken, the
opposition must be at an end. That resolution is a law, and resistance to it punishable.
But no favorable circumstances palliate or atone for the disadvantages of dissension in the executive department. Here, they
are pure and unmixed. There is no point at which they cease to operate. They serve to embarrass and weaken the execution of
the plan or measure to which they relate, from the first step to the final conclusion of it.
They constantly counteract those qualities in the Executive which are the most necessary ingredients in its composition -
vigor and expedition, and this without any counterbalancing good.
In the conduct of war, in which the energy of the Executive is the bulwark of the national security, every thing would be to be
apprehended from its plurality.
10. How does Hamilton view the processes and interactions of the legislature?
11. How are decisiveness and quick action good qualities when exercised by the executive?
12. Why is this energy especially important in the arena of national security?

Answer 1

Hamilton views the legislature as promoting deliberation and checks against majority power. Decisiveness and quick action are seen as good qualities in the executive branch. Energy in the executive is crucial for national security.

Step-by-step explanation:

Alexander Hamilton views the processes and interactions of the legislature as necessary for promoting deliberation and circumspection. He believes that the differences of opinion and party conflicts in the legislature can serve as checks and balances to prevent excessive majority power. Hamilton argues that promptitude of decision in the legislature can often be problematic and hinder the execution of salutary plans.

Decisiveness and quick action are seen as good qualities when exercised by the executive because they promote vigor and expedition. In the executive branch, there is no opposition once a resolution is taken, making prompt action more beneficial in this department. Hamilton believes that dissension in the executive branch can constantly counteract the necessary qualities of vigor and expedition, hampering the execution of plans or measures.

In the arena of national security, Hamilton argues that energy in the executive branch is especially important. The energy of the executive is the bulwark of national security, and an energetic executive is needed to ensure the safety and defense of the nation. The prompt execution of plans and measures is crucial for effective national security.

Learn more about Views on legislature and executive branches