Final answer:
Categorizing scenarios based on the Lemon v. Kurtzman criteria for constitutionality in religion and education.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks to categorize various scenarios based on the criteria established in Lemon v. Kurtzman. Let's go through each scenario:
A.
The law that provides reimbursement to private schools for teachers' salaries, textbooks, and teaching materials can be categorized as unconstitutional according to the Lemon v. Kurtzman criteria. This is because it has the primary effect of advancing religion.
B.
The use of public funds to pay for field trips for parochial schools can also be categorized as unconstitutional according to the Lemon v. Kurtzman criteria. This would excessively entangle the government with religion.
C.
The law that provides reimbursement to church-related schools for administering state standardized tests is constitutional based on the Lemon v. Kurtzman criteria. The primary effect here is not to advance religion, and it does not excessively entangle the government with religion.
D.
The use of public funds to pay any part of the salaries of teachers who teach secular courses in parochial schools can be categorized as unconstitutional according to the Lemon v. Kurtzman criteria. This would excessively entangle the government with religion.
E.
The use of public funds to provide an interpreter for a deaf school is constitutional based on the Lemon v. Kurtzman criteria. The primary effect here is not to advance religion, and it does not excessively entangle the government with religion.
Learn more about Constitutionality of laws in religion and education