30.6k views
1 vote
When evaluating a source, which of these might indicate that the source is unreliable?

O The author did not conduct their own research, but cited their sources.
O The author is an expert in the field.
O The website is an anonymous blog.
O The writing was published by a nonprofit organization.

User Luacassus
by
8.9k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Several indicators that a source might be unreliable include not conducting original research, anonymous blogs, and publication by nonprofit organizations.


Step-by-step explanation:

When evaluating a source, there are several indicators that might suggest it is unreliable. One such indicator is if the author did not conduct their own research, but simply cited their sources. While the author may have referenced credible sources, the lack of original research can diminish the reliability of the source.

Another indicator of an unreliable source is if it is an anonymous blog. Since the author's identity is unknown, it becomes difficult to verify their credentials or expertise in the subject matter.

Furthermore, the fact that a writing was published by a nonprofit organization does not automatically guarantee its reliability. While nonprofit organizations can produce reputable content, it is still important to critically assess the quality and accuracy of the information provided.


Learn more about Evaluating unreliable sources

User Voula
by
8.7k points