Question

To prevent damage from natural hazards, scientists must consider the best ways to keep people safe while also

considering practicality in terms of cost, interference of new structures in day-to-day life, and other such factors.
.
If your plan worked, was it a practical solution for the community? Can you think of any downsides to your plan?
If it didn't work, how would you improve your plan? Can you foresee any problems with executing your plan?
.

Answer 1

When designing strategies to prevent damage from natural hazards, scientists must consider practicality, cost, and other factors. If a plan works, it can be considered practical, but may have downsides. If a plan doesn't work, improvements can be made by addressing shortcomings and anticipating problems with execution.

Step-by-step explanation:

When designing strategies to prevent damage from natural hazards, scientists must consider practicality in terms of cost, interference of new structures in day-to-day life, and other factors. If a plan works, it can be considered a practical solution for the community. However, there may be downsides to the plan, such as the limitations of the solution in certain scenarios or the potential impact on the environment.

If a plan doesn't work, improvements can be made by evaluating the reasons for its failure and addressing the shortcomings. Problems with executing the plan can be anticipated by considering potential challenges, such as lack of resources, community resistance, or technical feasibility.

Learn more about Natural hazard prevention