Final answer:
The Dred Scott v. Sandford case addressed three main questions: Dred Scott's citizenship status, whether his stay in a free state granted him freedom, and if Congress could regulate slavery in the territories. The Supreme Court ruled against Scott, reaffirming his status as a slave, denying citizenship to Black people, and deeming parts of the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, three crucial questions were addressed by the U.S Supreme Court. First, whether Dred Scott, who was enslaved, could be considered a citizen of the United States. Second, the court examined if Dred Scott's residence in a free state made him a free man. Lastly, they deliberated on whether Congress had the authority to regulate the existence or nonexistence of slavery in the territories.
The Supreme Court's decision, by a 7-2 vote, held that Scott was still enslaved, Black people could never be citizens, and the parts of the Missouri Compromise that had prohibited slavery in certain territories were unconstitutional.
Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford