234k views
2 votes
9. Without the Bill of Rights, the Constitution was incomplete. Which side (Federalist

or AntiFederalist) held this view and why?

User Ebottard
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

The AntiFederalist side held the view that without the Bill of Rights, the Constitution was incomplete because it did not adequately protect the individual rights of citizens.


Step-by-step explanation:

The AntiFederalist side held the view that without the Bill of Rights, the Constitution was incomplete. They argued this because they believed that the Constitution granted too much power to the federal government and did not adequately protect the individual rights of citizens. They feared that without a specific list of rights, the government could infringe upon the liberties of the people.


Learn more about The significance of the Bill of Rights in completing the Constitution

User Bob Risky
by
7.6k points