169k views
3 votes
An inmate has written the warden of the prison a letter. In the letter, they describe several possible violations of their rights under the Religious Land

Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). Which is NOT something the inmate might include in their letter?
"I was forced to eat pork even though doing so is prohibited by my religion."
B.
"I wasn't granted a furlough so that I could attend church services outside my facility."
O A.
O C. "I wasn't allowed to make contact or receive documents from my priest."
O D. "I wasn't permitted to watch religious sermons on the television, even after requesting permission."

User ViSa
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The inmate might include all of the mentioned violations of their rights under RLUIPA, except for not being granted a furlough to attend church services outside the facility.


Step-by-step explanation:

The inmate might include all of the mentioned violations of their rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) in their letter, except for option B - "I wasn't granted a furlough so that I could attend church services outside my facility." This is because RLUIPA primarily focuses on protecting an inmate's right to practice their religion while incarcerated, rather than granting them furloughs for religious services outside the facility.


Learn more about Rights violations under RLUIPA

User Iszi
by
7.6k points