Question

Do you support or oppose the following statement?

The use of the atomic bomb against Japanese civilians and military personnel was a
morally acceptable method to end World War Il.
In the discussion, write an argument to either support or oppose the statement
above. Begin with a specific thesis statement that briefly summarizes your opinion.
An example thesis would begin by stating, "I believe the use of the atomic bomb
against Japanese civilians and military personnel [was/was not a morally
acceptable measure to end World War lI because Provide at least two pieces of
evidence to support your thesis. Your response should be three or four paragraphs
long.

Answer 1

The use of the atomic bomb against Japanese civilians and military personnel was not morally acceptable to end World War II.

Step-by-step explanation:

I believe the use of the atomic bomb against Japanese civilians and military personnel was not a morally acceptable measure to end World War II because

1. Majority of victims were civilians: The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in the deaths of approximately 200,000 people, most of them being innocent civilians.
2. Other options were available: Critics argue that alternatives such as a demonstration of the bomb's power or a naval blockade of Japan could have been pursued to force surrender without targeting civilians.

Considering these factors, it can be concluded that the use of the atomic bomb was not morally justifiable.

Learn more about morality and the use of atomic bomb