Question

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or

affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Which of the following possible court cases could be argued under the terms of the quote above? (5 points)
O a person sues the state for building an armory on nearby property
O a person refuses to serve the military when called up through a draft
O a person shoots and kills someone who broke into the family's home
O a person rejects police requests to unlock the car doors and windows

Answer 1

The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. The possible court case that could be argued under the terms of the quote is a person rejecting police requests to unlock the car doors and windows.

Step-by-step explanation:

The quote provided is the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. Based on the terms of the quote, the court case that could be argued is: 'A person rejects police requests to unlock the car doors and windows.' This case could be argued under the Fourth Amendment because it addresses the right of the people to be secure in their persons and effects against unreasonable searches. In this case, the police request to unlock the car doors and windows could be seen as a search without probable cause or a warrant.

Learn more about The Fourth Amendment and the right to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures