Final answer:
If everyone had an equal share of the world, it would imply a system of absolute equality. However, practical challenges and implications need to be considered. History shows that strict egalitarian systems can have drawbacks.
Step-by-step explanation:
If everyone had an equal share of the world, it would imply a system of absolute equality, where each individual would possess an equal amount of resources, wealth, and power. In theory, this could lead to a more equitable society, where basic needs are met for all and there is no extreme wealth or poverty. However, it is important to consider the practical implications and challenges of such a scenario.
For instance, the concept of equal share assumes that everyone has the same capabilities, needs, and desires, which might not be the case in reality. Additionally, the distribution of resources and wealth would need to be carefully managed and regulated to ensure sustainability and prevent inequalities from emerging over time. Furthermore, it overlooks the role of individual effort, innovation, and incentive in driving progress and development.
History has shown that attempts at implementing strict egalitarian systems have often faced challenges, as they can stifle productivity and motivation when there is no differentiation in rewards for hard work or exceptional achievements. In the end, achieving absolute equality is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires careful consideration of various factors.
Learn more about Equality and the challenges of achieving absolute equality