Question

Write a conclusion paragraph 5-7 sentences ASAP

The article "Should Felons Vote," published by Edward Feller, explores the debates surrounding felons voting rights. The author effectively combines the use of ethos, pathos, and logos to write a compelling argument regarding the restoration of voting rights for felons. Throughout the article Feller clearly establishes his credibility through his use of research as well as a balanced perspective. He also demonstrates an emotional connection with the readers while also providing them with logical reasoning. This comprehensive approach creates an overall understanding of the complexities surrounding felon voting rights, compelling the audience to really consider the issue from various perspectives.
Edward Feller effectively uses ethos, also known as credibility, by using his expertise and reliable sources to make his article convincing. He talks about his experience and research on the subject, which makes him seem knowledgeable and trustworthy. He also uses information from respected institutions and experts to back up his points. He addresses opposing views, showing that he is open to different perspectives. He explains his arguments clearly and logically, using facts and evidence.
Feller also uses pathos effectively by using personal stories of people affected by felon disenfranchisement to make readers feel empathy and support his argument. He wants the reader to feel compassion and understand the struggles of felons who can't vote. He uses strong and emotional words like "injustice," "discrimination," and "unfair treatment" to make the reader angry and sympathetic toward felons. He connects with the reader's sense of justice and fairness by arguing that denying felons the right to vote goes against democracy and equal representation. He presents statistics showing how felon disenfranchisement disproportionately affects minority communities, aiming to highlight the unfairness and the need for change.
Logos is a technique that uses logic and reasoning to make an argument. Feller uses this technique by providing facts and logical reasoning in his article. For example, he uses statistics from a study by the Brennan Center for Justice to support his claim that taking away felons voting rights doesn't decrease crime. This study strengthens his argument and shows that denying felons the right to vote doesn't achieve its purpose. He also uses logical reasoning to support his thesis, explaining that if felons have completed their sentence and reintegrated into society, they should be allowed to participate in elections. He addresses opposing views and offers logical counterarguments. He acknowledges concerns about felons voting for harmful policies but emphasizes that voting rights should be restored to those who have shown rehabilitation and successful reintegration.

Answer 1

Answer: The article “Should Felons Vote” by Edward Feller is a persuasive and well-written piece that explores the controversial issue of felon voting rights. Feller uses a combination of ethos, pathos, and logos to make his argument more convincing and appealing to the readers. He establishes his credibility, appeals to the emotions, and provides logical reasoning to support his claim that felons should have their voting rights restored after completing their sentence and reintegrating into society. He also acknowledges and refutes the opposing views, showing that he has considered the issue from different angles. By doing so, he creates a comprehensive and balanced perspective on the issue, compelling the readers to rethink their stance on felon voting rights. Feller’s article is an effective example of how to use rhetorical strategies to write a strong and persuasive argument.