Answer:
In his pamphlet "Common Sense," Thomas Paine vehemently argues against the possibility of working out differences with Great Britain and advocates for American independence. Paine presents a series of compelling arguments to support his stance, employing logical reasoning and historical examples to emphasize the futility of reconciliation. His reasoning is highly effective, as he successfully challenges the prevailing belief that reconciliation is feasible.
Paine begins by asserting that the idea of reconciliation is based on false assumptions about the nature of British rule and the intentions of the British government. He argues that Britain has consistently shown a disregard for American interests and rights, citing instances such as the imposition of taxes without representation and the suppression of colonial trade. Paine contends that these actions demonstrate a pattern of oppression and exploitation, making it unlikely that Britain would genuinely seek to reconcile with the colonies.
To further support his argument, Paine highlights the inherent flaws in monarchy and hereditary succession. He asserts that monarchy is fundamentally incompatible with the principles of liberty and equality, as it concentrates power in the hands of a single individual or family. Paine argues that this concentration of power inevitably leads to corruption and tyranny, making reconciliation with a monarchical system inherently problematic.
Moreover, Paine draws upon historical examples to illustrate the futility of reconciliation. He compares the relationship between Britain and America to that between a master and a slave, arguing that attempting to reconcile with an oppressive power is akin to accepting servitude. Paine points out that history has shown how attempts at reconciliation have often resulted in further subjugation and loss of rights for those seeking compromise.
Paine's reasoning is highly effective due to his ability to present logical arguments supported by evidence. He appeals to common sense and taps into the growing sentiment among colonists for independence. By highlighting specific grievances against British rule and exposing the flaws in monarchy, Paine effectively undermines any notion of reconciliation as a viable option.
One example of Paine's effective reasoning can be found in his critique of monarchy. He argues, "Monarchy is ranked in scripture as one of the sins of the Jews, for which a curse in reserve is denounced against them." This biblical reference not only appeals to religious sentiments prevalent at the time but also suggests that monarchy is inherently sinful and contrary to divine principles. By invoking religious authority, Paine strengthens his argument against reconciliation with a monarchical power.
Another example of Paine's effective reasoning lies in his use of historical analogies. He compares the relationship between Britain and America to that between a master and a slave, stating, "Europe, and not England, is the parent country of America. This new world hath been the asylum for the persecuted lovers of civil and religious liberty from every part of Europe." By framing the relationship in terms of oppression and seeking refuge, Paine taps into the colonists' desire for freedom and independence.
In conclusion, Thomas Paine responds to those who believe in the possibility of working out differences with Great Britain by presenting a series of compelling arguments against reconciliation. His reasoning is highly effective due to his ability to expose the flaws in British rule, critique monarchy, and draw upon historical examples. By appealing to common sense and tapping into the growing sentiment for independence, Paine successfully challenges the prevailing belief in reconciliation.
Step-by-step explanation: