43.8k views
0 votes
Riders are amendments to a particular bill. Riders are only allowed in the . Those who riders say they provide a check on the executive branch. Those who riders say they put legislation at risk of being vetoed.

User Niclar
by
7.0k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

Riders are amendments to a particular bill. Riders are only allowed in the legislative process. Those who support riders say they provide a check on the executive branch. Those who oppose riders say they put legislation at risk of being vetoed.

1. Definition of riders: Riders are additional provisions or amendments attached to a bill that may or may not be directly related to the main subject of the bill. They are added during the legislative process and can significantly impact the content and scope of the original bill.

2. Legislative process: Riders are allowed in the legislative process, which refers to the procedure through which a bill becomes law. During the process, legislators have the opportunity to introduce and attach riders to bills as they move through committees and floor votes.

3. Check on the executive branch: Supporters of riders argue that they provide a check on the power of the executive branch, particularly the President or other executive officials who have the authority to veto legislation. Riders allow legislators to add provisions that may not have enough support to pass on their own but can be attached to larger bills that are more likely to become law.

4. Risk of veto: On the other hand, opponents of riders argue that they put legislation at risk of being vetoed. By adding unrelated or controversial provisions to a bill, riders can make the overall legislation less appealing to the executive branch, increasing the chances of a veto. This can delay or prevent the passage of important legislation.

In summary, riders are amendments added to a bill during the legislative process. They are allowed in the legislative process and can provide a check on the executive branch, according to their supporters. However, opponents argue that riders can jeopardize the passage of legislation by making it more susceptible to vetoes.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Parishodak
by
7.4k points
0 votes

Final answer:

Riders are amendments attached to a bill that can influence its passage; the line-item veto allows executives to veto parts of a bill, which was ruled unconstitutional for the president but still exists for many governors. The balance of power is maintained through the ability to override vetoes with a supermajority vote.

Step-by-step explanation:

Riders are amendments added to a bill often to secure the support of certain members of Congress, potentially for unrelated provisions that may not pass on their own merit. The term line-item veto refers to the power that allows an executive, such as a governor or president, to veto specific portions of a bill while signing the rest into law. This power has been contentious at the federal level, and in 1996, Congress granted the president a line-item veto, which President Clinton used sparingly. However, this power was subsequently ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1998, thereby eliminating its use at the federal level. Meanwhile, many state governors continue to have the line-item veto as part of their powers.

Supporters of riders argue they provide a check on the executive branch by leveraging legislative support, while critics contend that riders risk the passage of a bill by making it vulnerable to a veto. The veto itself is an executive power that can check the legislature, though it can be overridden with a supermajority vote—a feature that acts as a check within a check in the governmental balance of powers.

User Assaf Levy
by
6.7k points