Answer:
In summary, the notion of "The White Man's Burden" was a paternalistic and ethnocentric justification for imperialism, and it did not accurately reflect the desires and aspirations of the people in colonized countries. Instead, it made imperialism more challenging by fueling resistance and movements for self-determination.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept of "The White Man's Burden" was a phrase used in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to justify European imperialist expansion and colonial rule in various parts of the world, particularly in Africa and Asia. It was based on the belief that European colonial powers had a moral duty to "civilize" and "uplift" the people of what was often referred to as "weaker" or "savage" nations.
The poem "The White Man's Burden" by Rudyard Kipling, which popularized this concept, does not accurately represent the people's perspectives in colonized regions. In reality, the people of these countries often resisted European colonial rule and sought independence and self-determination. They did not necessarily want "whites" to rule over them, as they had their own cultures, societies, and leadership structures.
Imperialism was challenging for indigenous populations, as it often resulted in the exploitation and subjugation of their people, loss of resources, and the imposition of foreign cultural norms and values. It led to various forms of resistance, including uprisings, protests, and independence movements.