Final answer:
Major psychological and psychiatric associations suggest that memories from before age three are generally unreliable. Research is split on whether traumatic experiences can be repressed and recovered, with one side arguing in favor and another challenging the methods and accuracy of such memory recovery. The debate has real-world implications for therapy and treating disorders like PTSD.
Step-by-step explanation:
Regarding the controversy surrounding repressed memories of sexual abuse, the consensus among major psychological and psychiatric associations suggests that adult memories of experiences happening before age 3 are generally unreliable. The research on this topic has been divided, with one side supporting the idea that traumatic experiences can be repressed and later recovered intact through therapeutic techniques, while the other side, including researchers like Loftus, challenges the accuracy of such recovered memories and the methods used to elicit them.
The concept of false memory syndrome, where individuals recall events that never occurred, is particularly concerning in cases without independent witnesses. Moreover, defense mechanisms such as repression are proposed to block overwhelming memories from conscious awareness, potentially causing symptoms in other areas. These debates are not only academic but also have significant implications for therapy, including treatments for disorders like post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD) where recollection impacts mental health.