Question

What was the Court's CONCLUSION (decision, holding) in the Citizens United v FEC case?

O For Citizens United. The First Amendment provides a strict basis for allowing the government to limit corporate independent expenditures.
O For Citizens United. The First Amendment provides no basis for allowing the government to limit corporate independent expenditures.
O For the FEC. The First Amendment provides no basis for allowing the government to limit corporate independent expenditures.
O For the FEC. The First Amendment provides a basis for allowing the government to limit corporate independent expenditures.

Answer 1

The Court's conclusion in the Citizens United v FEC case was for Citizens United - the First Amendment provides no basis for allowing the government to limit corporate independent expenditures.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Court's conclusion in the Citizens United v FEC case was for Citizens United. The Court held that the First Amendment provides no basis for allowing the government to limit corporate independent expenditures. This means that under the First Amendment, corporations have the right to spend money in support of political candidates or causes.

Learn more about Conclusion in Citizens United v FEC case