Answer:
D. Counterproductive.
Step-by-step explanation:
Front-loading, which refers to the practice of scheduling the majority of primary elections early in the presidential election cycle, has been criticized for being counterproductive. It often results in a compressed campaign schedule that forces candidates to focus their resources and attention on early states at the expense of later states. This can lead to a rush to judgment by voters and the media, as well as a disproportionate influence for early states in shaping the overall outcome of the nomination process.
Front-loading can also be problematic for voters, as it may limit their ability to make informed decisions about candidates due to the compressed timeline and the limited exposure of candidates to a broad range of issues and voters. Finally, front-loading can be counterproductive for the political parties themselves, as it may result in a candidate who is not well-positioned to win the general election due to lack of appeal to the broader electorate.