Answer:
The justification for putting soldiers at risk is a complex ethical and political issue that varies depending on the specific context of the conflict. Generally, the decision to use military force should be based on a careful assessment of the potential risks and benefits, the likelihood of success, and the moral and legal justifications for intervention.
The decision on who should intervene in a conflict depends on a range of factors, including the level of threat to international security, the capacity of the parties involved to resolve the conflict peacefully, and the willingness of regional and international actors to support intervention.
Multilateral intervention is generally preferable to unilateral intervention because it is more likely to have legitimacy and international support. Multilateral interventions involve cooperation among multiple countries or international organizations, which can help to ensure that the intervention is based on a shared understanding of the objectives and is carried out in a transparent and accountable manner.
However, there may be situations where unilateral intervention is necessary, such as when a state is facing an imminent threat to its security or when multilateral efforts have failed to address a crisis. In these cases, the use of force must be based on a clear legal and moral justification and should be carried out with a focus on minimizing harm to civilians and achieving a peaceful resolution of the conflict.
Step-by-step explanation: