Step-by-step explanation:
After reading Bryan Stevenson's book "Just Mercy," my answer regarding whether juveniles should receive life sentences has strengthened. Stevenson's work highlights the injustice and cruelty that often occurs within the criminal justice system, particularly when it comes to juvenile offenders.
One of the most striking examples in the book is the story of Trina Garnett, who was sentenced to life without parole at just 14 years old. Stevenson argues that this kind of sentencing is not only cruel but also unconstitutional, as it violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
Stevenson also highlights the impact that incarceration can have on juveniles, both in terms of their physical and emotional development. He argues that imprisoning juveniles for life essentially robs them of the opportunity to grow and change, denying them a chance at rehabilitation and redemption.
Furthermore, Stevenson shows that juveniles often end up in the criminal justice system as a result of circumstances beyond their control, such as poverty, abuse, and neglect. Punishing them with life sentences only serves to perpetuate the cycle of violence and poverty, rather than addressing the root causes of their criminal behavior.
Overall, after reading "Just Mercy," I am even more convinced that juveniles should not receive life sentences. Not only is it cruel and unconstitutional, but it also fails to address the underlying issues that contribute to juvenile delinquency. Instead, we should focus on restorative justice practices that prioritize rehabilitation and support for young people who have experienced trauma and adversity.