Step-by-step explanation:
Mary Shelley, the author of the novel "Frankenstein," had unique views on creation that were different from the perspectives of her time. She was influenced by the Enlightenment period and the scientific discoveries of the time, which led her to question traditional religious beliefs about the nature of creation.
Shelley's views on creation can be seen in her portrayal of Victor Frankenstein, the creator of the monster. Victor's obsession with creating life is rooted in his desire to transcend the limitations of human mortality and achieve god-like powers. However, his attempts to play god lead to disastrous consequences, as his creation becomes a monster that wreaks havoc on society.
Shelley's novel can be seen as a cautionary tale against the dangers of scientific progress without moral responsibility. She emphasizes the importance of considering the ethical implications of scientific discoveries and warns against the hubris of believing that humans can control the forces of nature.
Shelley's views on creation were likely different from those of her time because of the rapid changes occurring in science and technology. The Enlightenment period saw a shift away from traditional religious beliefs towards scientific rationalism and empirical observation. This led to a greater focus on experimentation and discovery, which challenged traditional notions of creation.
Shelley's novel also reflects the anxieties of her time about the potential consequences of unbridled scientific progress. The Industrial Revolution had led to unprecedented technological advancements but also brought about significant social and environmental challenges. The novel can be seen as a commentary on the dangers of unchecked progress and the importance of considering the long-term impacts of our actions.
In conclusion, Mary Shelley's views on creation were influenced by the scientific and philosophical developments of her time. Her novel "Frankenstein" serves as a warning against the dangers of playing god and the need for ethical considerations in scientific progress. Her perspective was unique for her time and continues to hold relevance today as we grapple with the ethical implications of emerging technologies.