In the fixed proportions case: x = y, y = x,
.
In the perfect substitutes case: x = 0 when
.
In the fixed proportions case where
:
- The demand function for x is x = y.
- The demand function for y is y = x.
- Plugging these demand functions back into the utility function yields the indirect utility function which equals V = min(x,y) = x = y.
- Starting with the indirect utility function, then solving for I and letting E = I yields the expenditure function which takes the form of
.
In the case of perfect substitutes where U(x,y) = x + y:
- When
, the demand function for x is x = 0 and the demand function for y is
.
- When
, the demand function for y is y = 0 and the demand function for x is
.
- Plugging these demand functions back into the utility function yields the indirect utility function which can be written in general terms as V = E.
- Starting with the indirect utility function, then solving for E and letting E = I yields the expenditure function which takes the form of E = I.
Question:
Consider the fixed proportions case where U(x,y) = min[x,y]
In the fixed proportions case, the demand function for x is x = ___ and the demand function for y is y = ____.
Plugging these demand functions back into the utility function yields the indirect utility function which equals V = _____
Starting with the indirect utility function, then solving for 1 and letting E = I yields the expenditure function which takes the form of E = ___
Consider the case of perfect substitutes where U(x,y)-x+y
In this perfect substitutes case, when
the demand function for x is x = ___ and the demand function for y is y = __.
When
the demand function for y is y = ___ and the demand function for y is x = __ when and the demand function for y is x = __.
Plugging these demand functions back into the utility function yields the indirect utility function which can be written in general terms as V = __.
Starting with the indirect utility function, then solving for l and letting E = I yields the expenditure function which takes the form of E = __.