Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Start off in the right place.
“Everyone’s got a different background, everyone’s got a different set of knowledge, and it’s our job to explain the information in terms that they already understand, “ says Walliman. “It’s no good leaving a gap and starting from there because they’re not going to follow along.”
If you’re in doubt about what your listener already knows or comprehends, simply ask. As you start to explain, he suggests, ask questions like “Do you already get this?” or “Is this making any sense?”
What if you’re talking to people who come from backgrounds that you’re not familiar with? If you’re speaking to a large group, “you have to make your best guess and a show of hands can be useful, too,” says Walliman. “It’s always better to err on the side of caution.”
Don’t worry too much about whether you’re telling the audience something they’ve already heard before. “People generally don’t mind,” says Waliman.
2. Don’t go too far down the rabbit hole.
Most of us love to learn — but we can absorb only so much at a time. Avoid bombarding people with too much knowledge3. Go for clarity over accuracy.
Walliman says when we're knowledgeable about a topic it's easy to worry about getting every fact explained perfectly. That can get in the way of comprehension. Instead, he says "It's better to come up with a simpler explanation that maybe isn't completely technically correct but it gets the point across." In this manner you give a basic understanding, and if the audience wants to learn more, you can then fill-in-the-blanks and complete the picture more fully and accurately.
I do a lot of original research for my books, keynotes, and classes I teach at Indiana University. On stage, I explain the very basics of the methodology behind a study I conducted, enough to make it interesting and to set up the payoff (the study results), but without worrying about being 100 percent accurate in explaining the methodology. To do so would counteract the emotional response I'm trying to build to when I reveal the study result. at once. “It’s better to explain, say,
three things that someone will understand … rather than barrage them with a whole load of information that kind of undoes all of your good work to begin with,” Walliman says.
Let’s say you and a friend are in an art museum. You see a painting you love — and one that you studied in college — but you can see that your friend doesn’t quite know what to make of it. You may feel tempted to explain every single thing you know about this particular work, telling her about the artist’s life and career, the materials and techniques used, the movement that the artist is part of, and so on.
Instead, try to focus on the bigger picture (pun intended). This can help your friend start to appreciate it. As an example, take Helen Frankenthaler’s Cool Summer (1962). Mention how, much like Jackson Pollock would drip paint, Frankenthaler would stain her canvases. Like Pollock’s dripping, staining was another cutting-edge technique of the time. Then, ask your frien4. Explain why you're so passionate about your topic.
If the audience can understand why you're fascinated with your topic and why it's so important, they're more likely to feel the same way. You have to establish the case for why they should care, just as in business when you have to establish the reason for why change is needed or why a certain strategy should be followed.
And don't be afraid to convey your enthusiasm in the energy you exude, in your voice, and in your movements. People get caught up in what you're caught up in, which ultimately aids in clarity of communication.
Hopefully, this article has brought clarity on achieving clarity. Now go make your point.d to look at the painting as if it were a landscape. What kind of natural scene could be conveyed with those colors in those configurations?