Answer:
Of the given options, the fact that least supports the toy company's claim is option D, which states that the toys are sold throughout the world.
The fact that the toys are sold worldwide does not provide any information regarding their durability or ability to withstand rough play. It simply means that the company has a wide distribution network.
On the other hand, options A, B, and C all provide evidence that the toys are indeed tough and can withstand rough play. For example, the fact that all metal parts are made of steel indicates that they are less likely to break or deform, while the five-year warranty against breakage implies that the company has confidence in the toys' durability. Additionally, the use of chip-resistant enamel paint suggests that the toys can withstand wear and tear.
Therefore, option D is the least relevant to supporting the claim that the toys are tough enough for kids who are tough on toys.
Step-by-step explanation: