"Big stick" diplomacy is a concept that gained popularity under President Theodore Roosevelt in the early 1900s. write two paragraphs of five to six sentences each. Your first paragraph should explain what "big stick" diplomacy is and give two examples of how it was used by the United States in the past. Your second paragraph should give one modern example of "big stick" diplomacy and explain the example, why this policy was used, and how it relates to past uses of the policy.
"Big stick" diplomacy is a foreign policy approach that relies on the use of military power to achieve diplomatic objectives. The concept gained popularity under President Theodore Roosevelt in the early 1900s and was used by the United States to extend its influence and protect its interests abroad. Two examples of "big stick" diplomacy in the past are the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine and the construction of the Panama Canal.
Answer: The Roosevelt Corollary was an addition to the Monroe Doctrine, which stated that the United States would intervene in Latin America to maintain stability and protect American interests. This policy was used to justify American military intervention in countries such as Cuba, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic. The construction of the Panama Canal was another example of "big stick" diplomacy, as it involved the use of military force to ensure the success of the project. The United States supported a rebellion in Panama against Colombia and then sent troops to protect the new government and ensure the completion of the canal.
A modern example of "big stick" diplomacy is the United States' approach to North Korea. The United States has maintained a strong military presence in the region, including the deployment of aircraft carriers and other military assets. This approach is intended to deter North Korea from pursuing its nuclear and missile programs and to protect the interests of the United States and its allies in the region. This policy is similar to past uses of "big stick" diplomacy, as it relies on military power to achieve diplomatic objectives and protect American interests abroad.